Skip to content

Category: Uncategorized


 Posted by Hello

En la revista Norte Americana “Architecture” La Nueva Tijuana y La Ciudad Fea comparten espacio. Octubre 2004.

OCTOBER 12, 2004 — “Tijuana is the ugliest city I have come to know, a filthy city,” René Peralta writes online of his birthplace. “In its urban condition, Tijuana is also deformed. But this deformity is what makes it interesting.”

An architect, teacher, and frequent blogger, Peralta is one of a band of emerging Tijuana designers, artists, and academics who embrace the chaos and friction of a city exploding with migration, development, and vibrant but clashing cultures. Small affluent neighborhoods dot the city’s old center and the Pacific coastline, while in every other direction thousands of shacks bereft of electricity and running water cling to steep, barren hillsides. As a design laboratory, Tijuana is as provocative as it is dysfunctional.

Peralta’s firm, generica arquitectos, rents a small office a short walk from the noisy, frenetic port of entry connecting San Ysidro, California, and Tijuana, where an estimated 7 million pedestrians and 34 million vehicles cross la linea each year. Intrepid street vendors, window washers, and begging children careen toward Mexicans and Americans in SUVs, F-150s, and jalopies creeping north. The circus atmosphere, dampened since September 11, 2001, has always been tinged with desperation.

Peralta is passionately rooted in Tijuana, where his family has lived and owned businesses and property for 80 years, a history few other local families can match. He and his forebears have watched generations of transients treat Tijuana as a mere steppingstone to the United States. In calling it “the ugliest city,” Peralta applies a concept he learned at the Architectural Association in the mid-1990s: Ugliness is born of excesses and absences. For him, Tijuana is both extremely stimulating and vexing.

Runaway Development

Peralta’s city is 17 miles south of San Diego. “Psychologically, culturally, socially, we have always had the world’s richest country right next to us,” says Miguel Robles-Duran of rhizoma, another young Tijuana architecture firm. “Not only that, we’re next to the most expensive state and one of the most expensive cities in the United States. Mexicans want to live like Americans, so developers here copy San Diego [housing tracts]. What’s worse, they make bad copies.”

Perhaps this view helps explain why Nueva Tijuana, the unofficial name for the city’s sprawling eastern flank, seems as alarming as the shantytowns to some observers. Gated residential tracts sporting slick marketing signs are big business.

Private developers are rushing to meet an unprecedented housing demand from migrants lured by jobs at maquiladoras, the border-hugging assembly plants owned by foreign companies. This latest boom is different: Mexican professionals have joined the throngs of unskilled workers, and some of these new arrivals plan to settle here permanently.

The city’s current population surge (estimated at 1.2 million in Mexico’s 2000 census, though experts say that figure could be 500,000 higher) is not expected to slow down any time soon. In response, the Baja California state government plans to create 50,000 mass-produced housing units this year and 60,000 in 2005, primarily financed by federal loans and built by private entities. Tijuana’s master plan places these housing tracts near the maquiladoras and stretching into the city’s eastern outskirts.

In researching a book Peralta is coauthoring on Tijuana, he was astonished to learn that nearly half the city’s population now lives in Nueva Tijuana. Housing construction gobbles up more than five acres of land per day, according to local city planners. Some of these developments crudely quote Spanish-style details, such as red-tile roofs and arched windows. But these cartoonish embellishments are too expensive for most Mexicans, so much of Nueva Tijuana is now sprouting flat-roofed, introverted masonry compounds with massive gates.

Gated communities are a justifiable response to Tijuana’s high crime rate, Robles-Duran says, which ranges from car theft to neighborhood shootouts. With high walls and locked gates, developers are providing security—along with utilities, schools, and paved roads—that the impoverished government has failed to deliver.

Most of the new tract homes sell for $25,000 to $40,000, but for just $15,000 a family can squeeze into a micro casa, a boxy, attached unit of less than 300 square feet. Suddenly, a maquiladora line worker earning $200 per month might be able to afford one of these tiny, one-bedroom homes, but ownership comes at a psychological price.

“People are going to go mad” in them, argues Peralta, who is also part of Operativa 4, an activist group of designers and artists who hope to infuse humanism and design expertise into this raging phenomenon. However rudimentary they may be, shacks can be expanded at will to accommodate extended families, but most micro casas are literally boxed in.

An Uphill Battle

“Architecture is a luxury here,” laments Robles-Duran, who recently left Tijuana to study at the Berlage Institute in Rotterdam. He doubts he and his architect wife, Gabriela Rendon, will return, except to oversee the completion of two private homes he designed that are now under construction.

Other young architects share Robles-Duran’s frustration with the city, yet they remain committed to easing its growing pains and elevating its substandard housing. Peralta, for example, hopes to find a new client to revive generica’s 2002 design of a five-level, modular apartment tower called the Mandelbrot Building. Commissioned (but not built for lack of funding) for a standard-sized urban parcel, it can be reconfigured for different sites. The Mandelbrot could become a mass-produced alternative to Nueva Tijuana’s ominous, two-story housing tracts.

If he could, Peralta would halt the city’s runaway expansion and redirect the massive building frenzy into high-density, high-rise housing near work, transportation, and cultural centers. He and his peers might stand a chance when Tijuana’s old core is redeveloped, a priority of its city planners. But the architects’ chances seem slim in Nueva Tijuana, where thousands of families can buy their first homes and the bulldozers never sleep.

Ann Jarmusch is the architecture critic at the San Diego Union-Tribune.


 Posted by Hello

En la revista Norte Americana “Architecture” La Nueva Tijuana y La Ciudad Fea comparten espacio. Octubre 2004.

OCTOBER 12, 2004 — “Tijuana is the ugliest city I have come to know, a filthy city,” René Peralta writes online of his birthplace. “In its urban condition, Tijuana is also deformed. But this deformity is what makes it interesting.”

An architect, teacher, and frequent blogger, Peralta is one of a band of emerging Tijuana designers, artists, and academics who embrace the chaos and friction of a city exploding with migration, development, and vibrant but clashing cultures. Small affluent neighborhoods dot the city’s old center and the Pacific coastline, while in every other direction thousands of shacks bereft of electricity and running water cling to steep, barren hillsides. As a design laboratory, Tijuana is as provocative as it is dysfunctional.

Peralta’s firm, generica arquitectos, rents a small office a short walk from the noisy, frenetic port of entry connecting San Ysidro, California, and Tijuana, where an estimated 7 million pedestrians and 34 million vehicles cross la linea each year. Intrepid street vendors, window washers, and begging children careen toward Mexicans and Americans in SUVs, F-150s, and jalopies creeping north. The circus atmosphere, dampened since September 11, 2001, has always been tinged with desperation.

Peralta is passionately rooted in Tijuana, where his family has lived and owned businesses and property for 80 years, a history few other local families can match. He and his forebears have watched generations of transients treat Tijuana as a mere steppingstone to the United States. In calling it “the ugliest city,” Peralta applies a concept he learned at the Architectural Association in the mid-1990s: Ugliness is born of excesses and absences. For him, Tijuana is both extremely stimulating and vexing.

Runaway Development

Peralta’s city is 17 miles south of San Diego. “Psychologically, culturally, socially, we have always had the world’s richest country right next to us,” says Miguel Robles-Duran of rhizoma, another young Tijuana architecture firm. “Not only that, we’re next to the most expensive state and one of the most expensive cities in the United States. Mexicans want to live like Americans, so developers here copy San Diego [housing tracts]. What’s worse, they make bad copies.”

Perhaps this view helps explain why Nueva Tijuana, the unofficial name for the city’s sprawling eastern flank, seems as alarming as the shantytowns to some observers. Gated residential tracts sporting slick marketing signs are big business.

Private developers are rushing to meet an unprecedented housing demand from migrants lured by jobs at maquiladoras, the border-hugging assembly plants owned by foreign companies. This latest boom is different: Mexican professionals have joined the throngs of unskilled workers, and some of these new arrivals plan to settle here permanently.

The city’s current population surge (estimated at 1.2 million in Mexico’s 2000 census, though experts say that figure could be 500,000 higher) is not expected to slow down any time soon. In response, the Baja California state government plans to create 50,000 mass-produced housing units this year and 60,000 in 2005, primarily financed by federal loans and built by private entities. Tijuana’s master plan places these housing tracts near the maquiladoras and stretching into the city’s eastern outskirts.

In researching a book Peralta is coauthoring on Tijuana, he was astonished to learn that nearly half the city’s population now lives in Nueva Tijuana. Housing construction gobbles up more than five acres of land per day, according to local city planners. Some of these developments crudely quote Spanish-style details, such as red-tile roofs and arched windows. But these cartoonish embellishments are too expensive for most Mexicans, so much of Nueva Tijuana is now sprouting flat-roofed, introverted masonry compounds with massive gates.

Gated communities are a justifiable response to Tijuana’s high crime rate, Robles-Duran says, which ranges from car theft to neighborhood shootouts. With high walls and locked gates, developers are providing security—along with utilities, schools, and paved roads—that the impoverished government has failed to deliver.

Most of the new tract homes sell for $25,000 to $40,000, but for just $15,000 a family can squeeze into a micro casa, a boxy, attached unit of less than 300 square feet. Suddenly, a maquiladora line worker earning $200 per month might be able to afford one of these tiny, one-bedroom homes, but ownership comes at a psychological price.

“People are going to go mad” in them, argues Peralta, who is also part of Operativa 4, an activist group of designers and artists who hope to infuse humanism and design expertise into this raging phenomenon. However rudimentary they may be, shacks can be expanded at will to accommodate extended families, but most micro casas are literally boxed in.

An Uphill Battle

“Architecture is a luxury here,” laments Robles-Duran, who recently left Tijuana to study at the Berlage Institute in Rotterdam. He doubts he and his architect wife, Gabriela Rendon, will return, except to oversee the completion of two private homes he designed that are now under construction.

Other young architects share Robles-Duran’s frustration with the city, yet they remain committed to easing its growing pains and elevating its substandard housing. Peralta, for example, hopes to find a new client to revive generica’s 2002 design of a five-level, modular apartment tower called the Mandelbrot Building. Commissioned (but not built for lack of funding) for a standard-sized urban parcel, it can be reconfigured for different sites. The Mandelbrot could become a mass-produced alternative to Nueva Tijuana’s ominous, two-story housing tracts.

If he could, Peralta would halt the city’s runaway expansion and redirect the massive building frenzy into high-density, high-rise housing near work, transportation, and cultural centers. He and his peers might stand a chance when Tijuana’s old core is redeveloped, a priority of its city planners. But the architects’ chances seem slim in Nueva Tijuana, where thousands of families can buy their first homes and the bulldozers never sleep.

Ann Jarmusch is the architecture critic at the San Diego Union-Tribune.

Resumen de la platica en Zakmut. Octubre 28, 2004

Generica Arquitectura y la Ciudad Fea


© generica 2004

 Posted by Hello

Introduccion

Después de cinco años generica continua como una practica alternativa, una oficina que hace y desase arquitectura – investigación – entre otras prácticas culturales.

Seguimos tercos a mantener el estatus de oficina experimental. Un tipo de práctica más común en países desarrollados “de primer mundo” donde la docencia y la práctica experimental van de mano en mano. Sin embargo para generica, Tijuana y su región es un campo fértil de ideas y procesos. El lema de generica “mucho trabajo poco dinero”.

La teoría no se aplica.

El hacer investigaciones sobre teoría de la arquitectura no hace del trabajo de generica arquitectura teórica. Así como tener una fijación sobre el concepto de la hibridación, no intenta construir una práctica arquitectónica antropológica. Generica es un practica alternativa. Alternativa en el sentido de que es una practica interesada en el espacio suave (smooth space) hecho de transformaciones y no de orden y jerarquía. (Deleuze/Guattari).

Generica se interesa en construcción y estructura en términos abstractos, como procesos de organización en referencia con el tiempo. En tiempo me refiero a un sentido futurista, pero un futuro inscrito en el presente. “Donde el presente se resiste a la posibilidad de ser presente a si mismo” (Andrew Benjamín).

No hay una fijación en construir significados, si no más bien construir organizaciones programáticas, tectónicas y efectos. La representación no es importante para generica. Sin embargo la arquitectura siempre parecerá arquitectura (P. Eisenmann) Vitruvio en su obra Los Diez Libros de Arquitecturaseñala tres reglas de estética que son el inicio de la arquitectura como representación (firmeza, utilidad y belleza). Vitruvio señala que los edificios deben de representar firmeza por que es lógico que son firmes.

La Ciudad Fea

Tradicionalmente lo feo (horrible) es lo opuesto a lo bello. De acuerdo al clasicismo helénico la belleza ah sido sinónimo de la proporción. Una proporción divina. El hombre es la imagen de dios y las proporciones de su cuerpo fueron producto del deseo divino, de esta forma las proporciones de la arquitectura deben de expresar el orden cósmico (R. Wittkower).

Alberti nos hace recordar que la arquitectura debe de seguir el mismo principio. En el diseño de la fachada para la S. Maria Novela Alberti por medio de su axioma básico, concinnitas universarum partium, crea una armonía entre todas las partes.

Una armonía que se basa en el sistema armónico-musical de Pitágoras.

Piranesi fue el primer modernista (M.Tafuri). En 1761 publica el campo marzio como una critica al objeto – el plano se convierte en justa posición de elementos urbanos puestos al azar y sin jerarquías. Una ciudad artificial, manufacturada – es la representación de la descomposición urbana.

Una descomposición de la arquitectura histórica tema que llevara a Adolf Loos un siglo y medio después a escribir los textos principales del modernismo – Ornament and Crime.

El modernismo trajo falsas esperanzas de un futuro tecnológico y del espacio universal. Esperanzas del futurismo Italiano ilusionado por nuevas tecnologías y un neo clasismo

fascista en la arquitectura de Albert Speer, el arquitecto de Hitler y considerado el brazo

derecho del Fuhrer Nazi.

Lo feo de acuerdo a Mark Cousins (Psicoanalista y maestro de teoría en AA) no es lo opuesto a la belleza, esta hecho de ausencias y excesos. Una deformación monstruosa o simplemente una debilidad a la mentira por que lo que no es bello también es una negación de la verdad.

Lo importante es que la experiencia de lo feo no es de carácter estético, pero de relaciones entre el sujeto y el objeto (feo) simplemente creando situaciones inesperadas

La ciudad fea hace su apariencia en películas como 1984 y Blade Runner.

Blade Runner presenta a Los Angeles como una ciudad entre la utopia y la distopia. (Mike Davis). Donde los habitantes hablan ingles, japones y spanglish. Una ciudad deformada por la industrialización, la tecnología y ambigúes entre lo natural y lo artificial. Edificios en proceso de descomposición y espacios donde la simulación es la felicidad.

Blade Runner es el campo marzio de nuevo, símil de la ciudad fea.

Será Tijuana Fea?

Resumen de la platica en Zakmut. Octubre 28, 2004

Generica Arquitectura y la Ciudad Fea


© generica 2004

 Posted by Hello

Introduccion

Después de cinco años generica continua como una practica alternativa, una oficina que hace y desase arquitectura – investigación – entre otras prácticas culturales.

Seguimos tercos a mantener el estatus de oficina experimental. Un tipo de práctica más común en países desarrollados “de primer mundo” donde la docencia y la práctica experimental van de mano en mano. Sin embargo para generica, Tijuana y su región es un campo fértil de ideas y procesos. El lema de generica “mucho trabajo poco dinero”.

La teoría no se aplica.

El hacer investigaciones sobre teoría de la arquitectura no hace del trabajo de generica arquitectura teórica. Así como tener una fijación sobre el concepto de la hibridación, no intenta construir una práctica arquitectónica antropológica. Generica es un practica alternativa. Alternativa en el sentido de que es una practica interesada en el espacio suave (smooth space) hecho de transformaciones y no de orden y jerarquía. (Deleuze/Guattari).

Generica se interesa en construcción y estructura en términos abstractos, como procesos de organización en referencia con el tiempo. En tiempo me refiero a un sentido futurista, pero un futuro inscrito en el presente. “Donde el presente se resiste a la posibilidad de ser presente a si mismo” (Andrew Benjamín).

No hay una fijación en construir significados, si no más bien construir organizaciones programáticas, tectónicas y efectos. La representación no es importante para generica. Sin embargo la arquitectura siempre parecerá arquitectura (P. Eisenmann) Vitruvio en su obra Los Diez Libros de Arquitecturaseñala tres reglas de estética que son el inicio de la arquitectura como representación (firmeza, utilidad y belleza). Vitruvio señala que los edificios deben de representar firmeza por que es lógico que son firmes.

La Ciudad Fea

Tradicionalmente lo feo (horrible) es lo opuesto a lo bello. De acuerdo al clasicismo helénico la belleza ah sido sinónimo de la proporción. Una proporción divina. El hombre es la imagen de dios y las proporciones de su cuerpo fueron producto del deseo divino, de esta forma las proporciones de la arquitectura deben de expresar el orden cósmico (R. Wittkower).

Alberti nos hace recordar que la arquitectura debe de seguir el mismo principio. En el diseño de la fachada para la S. Maria Novela Alberti por medio de su axioma básico, concinnitas universarum partium, crea una armonía entre todas las partes.

Una armonía que se basa en el sistema armónico-musical de Pitágoras.

Piranesi fue el primer modernista (M.Tafuri). En 1761 publica el campo marzio como una critica al objeto – el plano se convierte en justa posición de elementos urbanos puestos al azar y sin jerarquías. Una ciudad artificial, manufacturada – es la representación de la descomposición urbana.

Una descomposición de la arquitectura histórica tema que llevara a Adolf Loos un siglo y medio después a escribir los textos principales del modernismo – Ornament and Crime.

El modernismo trajo falsas esperanzas de un futuro tecnológico y del espacio universal. Esperanzas del futurismo Italiano ilusionado por nuevas tecnologías y un neo clasismo

fascista en la arquitectura de Albert Speer, el arquitecto de Hitler y considerado el brazo

derecho del Fuhrer Nazi.

Lo feo de acuerdo a Mark Cousins (Psicoanalista y maestro de teoría en AA) no es lo opuesto a la belleza, esta hecho de ausencias y excesos. Una deformación monstruosa o simplemente una debilidad a la mentira por que lo que no es bello también es una negación de la verdad.

Lo importante es que la experiencia de lo feo no es de carácter estético, pero de relaciones entre el sujeto y el objeto (feo) simplemente creando situaciones inesperadas

La ciudad fea hace su apariencia en películas como 1984 y Blade Runner.

Blade Runner presenta a Los Angeles como una ciudad entre la utopia y la distopia. (Mike Davis). Donde los habitantes hablan ingles, japones y spanglish. Una ciudad deformada por la industrialización, la tecnología y ambigúes entre lo natural y lo artificial. Edificios en proceso de descomposición y espacios donde la simulación es la felicidad.

Blade Runner es el campo marzio de nuevo, símil de la ciudad fea.

Será Tijuana Fea?


Conferencia de Arquitectura y Urbanismo Jueves 21 y 28 en Sakmut zona rio 7:00 pm apoyando una buena causa. Posted by Hello


Conferencia de Arquitectura y Urbanismo Jueves 21 y 28 en Sakmut zona rio 7:00 pm apoyando una buena causa. Posted by Hello

Uncomfortable Architecture

On Thursday October 07 I had the opportunity to witness a presentation of an architect’s work that reaffirmed the notion that spatial organization is ultimately a forte of architectural inquiry, more than it had been considered heretofore.

Andrew Zago imparted a succinct and thought-provoking lecture of his most exemplary work to a small crowd in the auditorium of the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego, in La Jolla. Zago’s work contrives an oceanic atmosphere of the deep, a concept of dense space and effects. As Bahram Shirdell once said “Architecture is not about depth, it’s about the deep”, asserting that architecture is a problem of space within critical practices in a time when contemporary issues focus on surface geometries, program organizations and other intricate forms. The influence of Shirdell and Kipnis is apparent in the conceptual oeuvre of Zago, an influence that I share from my AA days in the mid 90’s. Zago explores process and its materialization through diagrams that construct spatial effects. This is evident in his project for The Greening of Detroit Pavilion, where the operative diagrams take on a vaporous effect due to the translucency of the tubes, creating a blurred field that generates a spatial distortion within solid and void relationship.

Yet, the most intriguing project was the design and construction of a Presbyterian chapel, a unique solution resulting in subsiding of representational objects through spatial techniques. Viewing the frontal façade gave a sensation that a cross appeared by the effects of louvers and interior light. As Zago walk through the project a massive three dimensional cross suspend in space, in the manner of the Buddha in the Sokkuram Cave Temple of South Korea, became evident. A large crux immissa [t] with its transom protruding from the lateral facades of the building entrance hovers as you walk into the space. The interstitial space created by the cross creates a box in box effect however it can not be observed in its entirety due to the size in relationship to the interior space causing the perceiver to reformulate the relationship between void and mass. A misconstrued relationship of ecclesiastical space, a narthex deprived of Christian cosmology, alluding once again to Shirdell’s reference of the floating Buddha in Nara – objects hovering in vastness.

Zago’s idea of critical practice constructs a disparity within theoretical issues. While event space and other intricacies of contemporary discourse are the “flavor of the month” Zago’s practice, as far as I am concerned, re-postulates spatial architectonics as the precept of critical praxis.

Finally in the short (two question) and non confronting finale, an audience member questioned Zago’s pedagogic techniques by stating that as his student he inhibited the feeling that architecture is an enjoyable endeavor – it had become too serious. Only in San Diego would they question rigorous and critical practice. It seems that architects from this city are more interested with pragmatics and the latest issues of sustainability as discourse. In a city full of schindler-esque, barcelon-esque, and other spurious architectures, concepts are degraded to a buffoonish parti in the corner of a presentation board and practice is synonymous with service. To be critical requires commitment and rigor and it is beyond a 9 to 5 task, because as Shirdell once said “Architecture is hard, it’s very hard”.

Uncomfortable Architecture

On Thursday October 07 I had the opportunity to witness a presentation of an architect’s work that reaffirmed the notion that spatial organization is ultimately a forte of architectural inquiry, more than it had been considered heretofore.

Andrew Zago imparted a succinct and thought-provoking lecture of his most exemplary work to a small crowd in the auditorium of the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego, in La Jolla. Zago’s work contrives an oceanic atmosphere of the deep, a concept of dense space and effects. As Bahram Shirdell once said “Architecture is not about depth, it’s about the deep”, asserting that architecture is a problem of space within critical practices in a time when contemporary issues focus on surface geometries, program organizations and other intricate forms. The influence of Shirdell and Kipnis is apparent in the conceptual oeuvre of Zago, an influence that I share from my AA days in the mid 90’s. Zago explores process and its materialization through diagrams that construct spatial effects. This is evident in his project for The Greening of Detroit Pavilion, where the operative diagrams take on a vaporous effect due to the translucency of the tubes, creating a blurred field that generates a spatial distortion within solid and void relationship.

Yet, the most intriguing project was the design and construction of a Presbyterian chapel, a unique solution resulting in subsiding of representational objects through spatial techniques. Viewing the frontal façade gave a sensation that a cross appeared by the effects of louvers and interior light. As Zago walk through the project a massive three dimensional cross suspend in space, in the manner of the Buddha in the Sokkuram Cave Temple of South Korea, became evident. A large crux immissa [t] with its transom protruding from the lateral facades of the building entrance hovers as you walk into the space. The interstitial space created by the cross creates a box in box effect however it can not be observed in its entirety due to the size in relationship to the interior space causing the perceiver to reformulate the relationship between void and mass. A misconstrued relationship of ecclesiastical space, a narthex deprived of Christian cosmology, alluding once again to Shirdell’s reference of the floating Buddha in Nara – objects hovering in vastness.

Zago’s idea of critical practice constructs a disparity within theoretical issues. While event space and other intricacies of contemporary discourse are the “flavor of the month” Zago’s practice, as far as I am concerned, re-postulates spatial architectonics as the precept of critical praxis.

Finally in the short (two question) and non confronting finale, an audience member questioned Zago’s pedagogic techniques by stating that as his student he inhibited the feeling that architecture is an enjoyable endeavor – it had become too serious. Only in San Diego would they question rigorous and critical practice. It seems that architects from this city are more interested with pragmatics and the latest issues of sustainability as discourse. In a city full of schindler-esque, barcelon-esque, and other spurious architectures, concepts are degraded to a buffoonish parti in the corner of a presentation board and practice is synonymous with service. To be critical requires commitment and rigor and it is beyond a 9 to 5 task, because as Shirdell once said “Architecture is hard, it’s very hard”.